<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 20 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27471</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Commissioner of Wealth-tax&#039;s order, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the inclusion of specific sums in the assets of a firm while computing her share. Despite the petitioner&#039;s contentions and allegations of unjust treatment, the Court emphasized its limited review authority over administrative decisions. The Court ruled that the Commissioner&#039;s decision, not subject to appeal under the law, should stand, dismissing the petition and awarding costs against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 20 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27471</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Commissioner of Wealth-tax&#039;s order, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the inclusion of specific sums in the assets of a firm while computing her share. Despite the petitioner&#039;s contentions and allegations of unjust treatment, the Court emphasized its limited review authority over administrative decisions. The Court ruled that the Commissioner&#039;s decision, not subject to appeal under the law, should stand, dismissing the petition and awarding costs against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>