<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27470</link>
    <description>Death of a partner was treated as dissolving the firm, so a fresh partnership deed created a new firm for income-tax purposes. On that view, separate assessments were required for the period up to the partner&#039;s death and for the period thereafter. The analysis noted that this approach was consistent with earlier High Court decisions and was later recognised by the Legislature through the proviso to section 187(2), inserted retrospectively with effect from 1 April 1975.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27470</link>
      <description>Death of a partner was treated as dissolving the firm, so a fresh partnership deed created a new firm for income-tax purposes. On that view, separate assessments were required for the period up to the partner&#039;s death and for the period thereafter. The analysis noted that this approach was consistent with earlier High Court decisions and was later recognised by the Legislature through the proviso to section 187(2), inserted retrospectively with effect from 1 April 1975.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>