<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 810 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299578</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed petitions challenging the rejection of applications for issuing summons based on affidavits under Section 145(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that affidavits are subject to cross-examination and affirmed the importance of witnesses verifying facts in affidavits in compliance with procedural laws. The Court emphasized that documents submitted with complaints or affidavits cannot be considered evidence without proper examination. The Trial Court was instructed to ensure adherence to procedural requirements during the trial, and an undertaking regarding a non-bailable warrant was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 810 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299578</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed petitions challenging the rejection of applications for issuing summons based on affidavits under Section 145(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that affidavits are subject to cross-examination and affirmed the importance of witnesses verifying facts in affidavits in compliance with procedural laws. The Court emphasized that documents submitted with complaints or affidavits cannot be considered evidence without proper examination. The Trial Court was instructed to ensure adherence to procedural requirements during the trial, and an undertaking regarding a non-bailable warrant was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>