https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299574 A sale deed supported by an earlier oral sale, part cash payment and a promissory note for the balance was treated as a real transaction; benami character was not proved, and title was found to have passed to the plaintiffs' predecessors. Claims of adverse possession failed because the earlier possession was referable to an agreement to purchase and later possession was permissive once the sale was accepted as valid. An earlier withdrawn suit did not bar the later action, as the withdrawal order showed no final adjudication and no procedural bar arose on the facts stated. The concurrent findings in favour of the plaintiffs were affirmed. en-us Thu, 02 Oct 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:36:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299574 A sale deed supported by an earlier oral sale, part cash payment and a promissory note for the balance was treated as a real transaction; benami character was not proved, and title was found to have passed to the plaintiffs' predecessors. Claims of adverse possession failed because the earlier possession was referable to an agreement to purchase and later possession was permissive once the sale was accepted as valid. An earlier withdrawn suit did not bar the later action, as the withdrawal order showed no final adjudication and no procedural bar arose on the facts stated. The concurrent findings in favour of the plaintiffs were affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Oct 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299574