https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299572 The High Court held that the suit for injunction to restrain defendants from taking steps under the Revenue Recovery Act was maintainable. The court found that the requisition for recovery was issued after the limitation period had expired, emphasizing that a debt legally due can only be enforced through legal process. Despite dismissing the suit under Order XXIII, Rule 1(4), C.P.C., the court allowed the appeal without costs, ruling in favor of the plaintiff in the Second Appeal. en-us Fri, 16 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299572 The High Court held that the suit for injunction to restrain defendants from taking steps under the Revenue Recovery Act was maintainable. The court found that the requisition for recovery was issued after the limitation period had expired, emphasizing that a debt legally due can only be enforced through legal process. Despite dismissing the suit under Order XXIII, Rule 1(4), C.P.C., the court allowed the appeal without costs, ruling in favor of the plaintiff in the Second Appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299572