<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 571 - THE COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299573</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to disclose previous litigations, the significant delay in filing the petition, and the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The tribunal did not assess the merits of the case, citing these procedural issues. No costs order was issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 571 - THE COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299573</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to disclose previous litigations, the significant delay in filing the petition, and the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The tribunal did not assess the merits of the case, citing these procedural issues. No costs order was issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>