<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 879 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416113</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the prosecution sanction and complaint under Section 276C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was not warranted as the ingredients of the offenses were prima facie satisfied. The trial was deemed necessary for the prosecution to substantiate the charges against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 879 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416113</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the prosecution sanction and complaint under Section 276C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was not warranted as the ingredients of the offenses were prima facie satisfied. The trial was deemed necessary for the prosecution to substantiate the charges against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>