<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 857 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416091</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the revocation of the customs broker license and forfeiture of the deposit. It emphasized the importance of proportionate penalties in regulatory enforcement, highlighting the need for penalties to align with the severity of the offense. The decision focused on maintaining a balance between regulatory compliance and fair punishment, cautioning against unduly harsh penalties for individual breaches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 857 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416091</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the revocation of the customs broker license and forfeiture of the deposit. It emphasized the importance of proportionate penalties in regulatory enforcement, highlighting the need for penalties to align with the severity of the offense. The decision focused on maintaining a balance between regulatory compliance and fair punishment, cautioning against unduly harsh penalties for individual breaches.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>