https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416079 The court quashed the assessment orders for the years 2010-2016, directing the petitioner to deposit a specified amount within 60 days for fresh assessment. It emphasized the need for proper justification and legal basis for attaching the bank account. Concerns were raised about the lack of clarity in determining tax amounts and the absence of supporting records. The court highlighted the petitioner's non-cooperation in tax proceedings, outlining specific procedural steps for compliance. The petitioners were clarified as separate assesses under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, with the son's writ petition disposed of and the father's petition allowed. en-us Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:43:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416079 The court quashed the assessment orders for the years 2010-2016, directing the petitioner to deposit a specified amount within 60 days for fresh assessment. It emphasized the need for proper justification and legal basis for attaching the bank account. Concerns were raised about the lack of clarity in determining tax amounts and the absence of supporting records. The court highlighted the petitioner's non-cooperation in tax proceedings, outlining specific procedural steps for compliance. The petitioners were clarified as separate assesses under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, with the son's writ petition disposed of and the father's petition allowed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416079