<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 843 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416077</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that captive consumers are not liable to pay the additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Court highlighted the statutory rights of captive consumers under Section 9 and clarified that the surcharge is only applicable when consumers receive supply from sources other than the distribution licensee with permission from the State Commission. The judgment emphasized the distinction between captive and ordinary consumers, noting the investment made by captive consumers in generating plants. The appellant was directed to adjust any surcharge already collected from captive consumers in future bills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 843 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416077</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that captive consumers are not liable to pay the additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Court highlighted the statutory rights of captive consumers under Section 9 and clarified that the surcharge is only applicable when consumers receive supply from sources other than the distribution licensee with permission from the State Commission. The judgment emphasized the distinction between captive and ordinary consumers, noting the investment made by captive consumers in generating plants. The appellant was directed to adjust any surcharge already collected from captive consumers in future bills.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>