<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2032 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299562</link>
    <description>Section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 makes the Limitation Act, 1963 applicable to a Section 9 insolvency application, and limitation is computed with reference to Part II of the Schedule from the date the right to apply accrues. On the record, the invoices indicated a later accrual date, so the application was not time-barred on the basis adopted by the Adjudicating Authority. As the application was otherwise complete and the limitation objection failed, the rejection could not stand. The matter was remitted for reconsideration with notice to the corporate debtor, and admission of the application and commencement of CIRP were warranted if non-appearance continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:43:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2032 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299562</link>
      <description>Section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 makes the Limitation Act, 1963 applicable to a Section 9 insolvency application, and limitation is computed with reference to Part II of the Schedule from the date the right to apply accrues. On the record, the invoices indicated a later accrual date, so the application was not time-barred on the basis adopted by the Adjudicating Authority. As the application was otherwise complete and the limitation objection failed, the rejection could not stand. The matter was remitted for reconsideration with notice to the corporate debtor, and admission of the application and commencement of CIRP were warranted if non-appearance continued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>