<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1408 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It clarified the correct method of computing disallowance u/s 14A, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents. The disallowance was adjusted to Rs. 26,21,424 by considering the ratio of dividend income to total turnover, and the matter was remitted to the AO for correct computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1408 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It clarified the correct method of computing disallowance u/s 14A, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents. The disallowance was adjusted to Rs. 26,21,424 by considering the ratio of dividend income to total turnover, and the matter was remitted to the AO for correct computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>