<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1614 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299566</link>
    <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it constituted a change of opinion, which is impermissible. The court quashed the notice and order rejecting objections, emphasizing the need for new tangible material before reopening assessments. The principle that a mere change of opinion is not a valid ground for reassessment was upheld, and the rule was made absolute without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1614 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299566</link>
      <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it constituted a change of opinion, which is impermissible. The court quashed the notice and order rejecting objections, emphasizing the need for new tangible material before reopening assessments. The principle that a mere change of opinion is not a valid ground for reassessment was upheld, and the rule was made absolute without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>