<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1250 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299565</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the denial of the appellant&#039;s request for a higher post on compassionate grounds, emphasizing that appointment rules must be followed. The appellant, having accepted the initial appointment, was estopped from claiming a higher position without legal basis. The writ appeal was dismissed, allowing respondents to proceed per the law. Costs were awarded, and the Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1250 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299565</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the denial of the appellant&#039;s request for a higher post on compassionate grounds, emphasizing that appointment rules must be followed. The appellant, having accepted the initial appointment, was estopped from claiming a higher position without legal basis. The writ appeal was dismissed, allowing respondents to proceed per the law. Costs were awarded, and the Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>