https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27460 The court found the seizure initially valid but questioned the prolonged retention of documents. It ruled that the retention beyond 180 days without proper communication to the petitioner was unlawful. The court directed the return of all seized materials to the petitioner by a specified date and dismissed the request for a writ of prohibition as premature. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:13:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27460 The court found the seizure initially valid but questioned the prolonged retention of documents. It ruled that the retention beyond 180 days without proper communication to the petitioner was unlawful. The court directed the return of all seized materials to the petitioner by a specified date and dismissed the request for a writ of prohibition as premature. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27460