https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299555 The Court declined to quash the criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing the need for trial to determine the petitioner's actual role and responsibility in the accused company despite her resignation as Director. The Court highlighted the necessity of factual adjudication based on the complaints alleging the petitioner's liability, referencing relevant precedents to support its decision. Consequently, the criminal original petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed, mandating the petitioner to undergo trial to establish her resignation and lack of responsibility for the company's actions. en-us Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:05:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299555 The Court declined to quash the criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing the need for trial to determine the petitioner's actual role and responsibility in the accused company despite her resignation as Director. The Court highlighted the necessity of factual adjudication based on the complaints alleging the petitioner's liability, referencing relevant precedents to support its decision. Consequently, the criminal original petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed, mandating the petitioner to undergo trial to establish her resignation and lack of responsibility for the company's actions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299555