<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1484 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order of the Principal Commissioner. The decision was based on the precedent set by a co-ordinate bench and the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of legal precedents and the application of statutory provisions in determining tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:23:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1484 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order of the Principal Commissioner. The decision was based on the precedent set by a co-ordinate bench and the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of legal precedents and the application of statutory provisions in determining tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>