<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1900 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299546</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a demand notice for violation of export obligation due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to renew permissions and bank guarantee. The appeal, filed out of time, was rejected for not addressing merits. The court allowed the petitioner to pay the liability in 12 monthly instalments, emphasizing the importance of following procedural requirements and presenting arguments timely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 09:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1900 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299546</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a demand notice for violation of export obligation due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to renew permissions and bank guarantee. The appeal, filed out of time, was rejected for not addressing merits. The court allowed the petitioner to pay the liability in 12 monthly instalments, emphasizing the importance of following procedural requirements and presenting arguments timely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>