<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1651 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299545</link>
    <description>The Chhattisgarh HC dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Movement of clinker by the assessee does not constitute removal from the place of removal. Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, and no substantial question of law favored the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 09:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1651 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299545</link>
      <description>The Chhattisgarh HC dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Movement of clinker by the assessee does not constitute removal from the place of removal. Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, and no substantial question of law favored the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>