<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 417 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299535</link>
    <description>Active participation in a liquor-adulteration enterprise was found from circumstantial evidence, including the role of those controlling the business and the scale of the operation. The text states that introducing methyl alcohol into liquor was not a mere admixture but the use of a poisonous substance, so permanent loss of eyesight constituted grievous hurt under Section 326 IPC and the ingredients of Section 328 IPC were also satisfied. It further notes that, in an Article 136 appeal, the Supreme Court considered its power plenary enough to issue suo motu notice for enhancement of sentence and to enhance punishment under Article 142 where justice required it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2021 14:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 417 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299535</link>
      <description>Active participation in a liquor-adulteration enterprise was found from circumstantial evidence, including the role of those controlling the business and the scale of the operation. The text states that introducing methyl alcohol into liquor was not a mere admixture but the use of a poisonous substance, so permanent loss of eyesight constituted grievous hurt under Section 326 IPC and the ingredients of Section 328 IPC were also satisfied. It further notes that, in an Article 136 appeal, the Supreme Court considered its power plenary enough to issue suo motu notice for enhancement of sentence and to enhance punishment under Article 142 where justice required it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>