<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 775 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416009</link>
    <description>The judge allowed the writ petition, directing the second respondent to consider the appeal within sixty days from the date of the order, in accordance with the law and on merits. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 775 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416009</link>
      <description>The judge allowed the writ petition, directing the second respondent to consider the appeal within sixty days from the date of the order, in accordance with the law and on merits. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>