<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 757 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed four appeals challenging late fees under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, following the High Court&#039;s decision that section 234E was a charging provision for late filing fees. However, the Tribunal allowed five appeals for reconsideration concerning the timeliness of orders under section 200A(1) as they were not passed within one year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 757 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed four appeals challenging late fees under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, following the High Court&#039;s decision that section 234E was a charging provision for late filing fees. However, the Tribunal allowed five appeals for reconsideration concerning the timeliness of orders under section 200A(1) as they were not passed within one year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>