<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1942 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was not justified as the Assessing Officer had adopted a legally permissible view regarding the assessment order. The Tribunal quashed the revision order under Section 263 and allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, concluding that the revenue recognition method and treatment of Transferable Development Rights were in accordance with accounting principles and guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2021 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1942 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was not justified as the Assessing Officer had adopted a legally permissible view regarding the assessment order. The Tribunal quashed the revision order under Section 263 and allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, concluding that the revenue recognition method and treatment of Transferable Development Rights were in accordance with accounting principles and guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>