<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 796 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299527</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was granted because the charge-sheet had already been filed, the investigating agency stated that custodial interrogation was not required, and the applicants had remained unarrested throughout the investigation. Their official status also reduced the risk of absconding, and the court found the usual conditions for anticipatory bail satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 796 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299527</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was granted because the charge-sheet had already been filed, the investigating agency stated that custodial interrogation was not required, and the applicants had remained unarrested throughout the investigation. Their official status also reduced the risk of absconding, and the court found the usual conditions for anticipatory bail satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>