https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299525 An amendment correcting plaint valuation for court fee and jurisdiction should ordinarily be permitted under Order VI Rule 17 CPC when sought before the evidence stage, especially where undervaluation is already in issue and the correction does not change the nature of the suit or prejudice the defendant. A possible shift in forum is not, by itself, a sufficient reason to refuse the amendment, and the trial court may still determine the correctness of court fee and jurisdiction on evidence. The request to substitute the authorised representative was not pressed, and the amendment was upheld. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:43:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299525 An amendment correcting plaint valuation for court fee and jurisdiction should ordinarily be permitted under Order VI Rule 17 CPC when sought before the evidence stage, especially where undervaluation is already in issue and the correction does not change the nature of the suit or prejudice the defendant. A possible shift in forum is not, by itself, a sufficient reason to refuse the amendment, and the trial court may still determine the correctness of court fee and jurisdiction on evidence. The request to substitute the authorised representative was not pressed, and the amendment was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299525