<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 814 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants in Appeals Nos. 27/2002, 28/2002, and 30/2002, setting aside the penalties imposed for unintentional and technical violations of reporting requirements. However, in Appeal No. 31/2002, the penalty was upheld as the appellant deliberately failed to report share acquisitions. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court regarding penalties were considered in the decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 814 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants in Appeals Nos. 27/2002, 28/2002, and 30/2002, setting aside the penalties imposed for unintentional and technical violations of reporting requirements. However, in Appeal No. 31/2002, the penalty was upheld as the appellant deliberately failed to report share acquisitions. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court regarding penalties were considered in the decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>