<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 725 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415959</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal overturned the revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Assessing Officer had reasonably assessed alleged bogus purchases based on precedents. The tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment order was incorrect and restored the original assessment, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 725 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415959</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal overturned the revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Assessing Officer had reasonably assessed alleged bogus purchases based on precedents. The tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment order was incorrect and restored the original assessment, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>