<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 56 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27431</link>
    <description>Section 230A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not apply to a sale deed executed in compliance with a decree for specific performance, because the transfer is not a voluntary conveyance by the assessee but one brought about by force of law. On that reasoning, the objection that a clearance certificate was required before execution and registration of the deed could not be sustained. The decree remained executable, and the revision petition was dismissed as without merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 56 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27431</link>
      <description>Section 230A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not apply to a sale deed executed in compliance with a decree for specific performance, because the transfer is not a voluntary conveyance by the assessee but one brought about by force of law. On that reasoning, the objection that a clearance certificate was required before execution and registration of the deed could not be sustained. The decree remained executable, and the revision petition was dismissed as without merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>