<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Recommends Deleting Harshly Worded Paragraph from Customs Order to Enhance Professional Integrity and Judgment Quality.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60980</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty on Advocate - Seeking deletion of para from order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) - In some occasions that are marked by their rarity, one may transcend the traditional contours of professional conduct; but this happens even with adjudicators as well; the ultimate object is to do justice to the cause; it hardly needs to be stated that the judgments &amp; orders should not be written with a pen dipped in acid; after all ‘acidity’ affects health; the acidic words rob away the living beauty of the scripts; viewed from this angle, the highlighted portion of the observations in the subject order need to be expunged; it is in the best interest of both the stakeholders, namely, Bar &amp; the Bench; such expunction would only add to the beauty of the order in question which is meticulously texted with appreciable articulation. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:17:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Recommends Deleting Harshly Worded Paragraph from Customs Order to Enhance Professional Integrity and Judgment Quality.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60980</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty on Advocate - Seeking deletion of para from order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) - In some occasions that are marked by their rarity, one may transcend the traditional contours of professional conduct; but this happens even with adjudicators as well; the ultimate object is to do justice to the cause; it hardly needs to be stated that the judgments &amp; orders should not be written with a pen dipped in acid; after all ‘acidity’ affects health; the acidic words rob away the living beauty of the scripts; viewed from this angle, the highlighted portion of the observations in the subject order need to be expunged; it is in the best interest of both the stakeholders, namely, Bar &amp; the Bench; such expunction would only add to the beauty of the order in question which is meticulously texted with appreciable articulation. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:17:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>