<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 688 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415922</link>
    <description>The High Court directed respondent no. 2 to return the petitioner&#039;s passport within a fortnight to facilitate his departure from India, emphasizing that there was no valid reason to continue withholding the passport. The Court rejected the argument that returning the passport would result in the petitioner fleeing the country, as there were no other pending prosecutions against him and highlighted potential visa validity issues due to his prolonged stay in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 688 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415922</link>
      <description>The High Court directed respondent no. 2 to return the petitioner&#039;s passport within a fortnight to facilitate his departure from India, emphasizing that there was no valid reason to continue withholding the passport. The Court rejected the argument that returning the passport would result in the petitioner fleeing the country, as there were no other pending prosecutions against him and highlighted potential visa validity issues due to his prolonged stay in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>