<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 687 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415921</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the order under appeal and remitted the matter to CESTAT for further consideration. The judgment clarified that none of the issues on merits between the parties were examined, leaving them open for decision by the Tribunal. The decision highlighted the importance of ensuring the correct exercise of jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Customs and the legality of non-imposition of penalties on specific officers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:52:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 687 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415921</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the order under appeal and remitted the matter to CESTAT for further consideration. The judgment clarified that none of the issues on merits between the parties were examined, leaving them open for decision by the Tribunal. The decision highlighted the importance of ensuring the correct exercise of jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Customs and the legality of non-imposition of penalties on specific officers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>