<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 671 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415905</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s eligibility for credit, the unjustified denial of refund based on procedural requirements, and legal precedents supporting the refund of unutilized credit. The judgment emphasized the importance of ensuring that substantive credit rights are upheld, even in the context of procedural challenges posed by the transition to the GST regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 671 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415905</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s eligibility for credit, the unjustified denial of refund based on procedural requirements, and legal precedents supporting the refund of unutilized credit. The judgment emphasized the importance of ensuring that substantive credit rights are upheld, even in the context of procedural challenges posed by the transition to the GST regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>