<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 666 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415900</link>
    <description>In a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the complainant&#039;s partnership status and authority to institute proceedings were in dispute, additional evidence under Section 391 CrPC may be permitted to place the partnership deed, resolution and authorisation on record. The court accepted that these foundational facts could be proved at the appellate stage, set aside the acquittal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after allowing evidence on partnership and authorisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 666 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415900</link>
      <description>In a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the complainant&#039;s partnership status and authority to institute proceedings were in dispute, additional evidence under Section 391 CrPC may be permitted to place the partnership deed, resolution and authorisation on record. The court accepted that these foundational facts could be proved at the appellate stage, set aside the acquittal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after allowing evidence on partnership and authorisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>