https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299508 Judicial review does not permit a court, especially at an interlocutory stage, to rewrite a clear statutory or delegated rule by substituting a new regulatory regime. Under Section 31D of the Copyright Act and Rule 29(4) of the Copyright Rules, prior notice must contain prescribed broadcast particulars, and the court held that the interim order had impermissibly converted that prior-notice framework into post facto compliance while extending the reporting period. The order was therefore set aside, and the appeals were allowed. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2022 12:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299508 Judicial review does not permit a court, especially at an interlocutory stage, to rewrite a clear statutory or delegated rule by substituting a new regulatory regime. Under Section 31D of the Copyright Act and Rule 29(4) of the Copyright Rules, prior notice must contain prescribed broadcast particulars, and the court held that the interim order had impermissibly converted that prior-notice framework into post facto compliance while extending the reporting period. The order was therefore set aside, and the appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299508