<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 899 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299489</link>
    <description>Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to criminal revision applications under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 because the Code does not expressly exclude it, and Section 29(2) allows Sections 4 to 24 to operate in the absence of exclusion. A short 19-day delay was condoned because the applicant gave a supported explanation that the certified copy had been misplaced in the advocate&#039;s office, with no material showing deliberate negligence or inaction. The refusal to condone delay was therefore set aside, and the criminal revision was allowed to proceed subject to the Court&#039;s conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 14:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 899 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299489</link>
      <description>Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to criminal revision applications under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 because the Code does not expressly exclude it, and Section 29(2) allows Sections 4 to 24 to operate in the absence of exclusion. A short 19-day delay was condoned because the applicant gave a supported explanation that the certified copy had been misplaced in the advocate&#039;s office, with no material showing deliberate negligence or inaction. The refusal to condone delay was therefore set aside, and the criminal revision was allowed to proceed subject to the Court&#039;s conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>