https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415889 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice for transferring goods without an accompanying E-way Bill. The court found that the notice was merely a proposal for penalty and tax, allowing the petitioner to respond. As the petitioner had already paid the demanded amount and released the vehicle, the court saw no merit in the petition. However, the petitioner was granted the opportunity to participate in the proceedings by filing a reply within 30 days and explaining the delay in generating the E-way Bill. The respondent was directed to issue appropriate orders within 30 days, ensuring the petitioner's right to be heard. en-us Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 13:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415889 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice for transferring goods without an accompanying E-way Bill. The court found that the notice was merely a proposal for penalty and tax, allowing the petitioner to respond. As the petitioner had already paid the demanded amount and released the vehicle, the court saw no merit in the petition. However, the petitioner was granted the opportunity to participate in the proceedings by filing a reply within 30 days and explaining the delay in generating the E-way Bill. The respondent was directed to issue appropriate orders within 30 days, ensuring the petitioner's right to be heard. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415889