<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 638 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415872</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding the penalty notice invalid as it did not specify the grounds for penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) as required by law. The decision emphasized the significance of a valid and specific penalty notice in maintaining penalty orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:06:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 638 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415872</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding the penalty notice invalid as it did not specify the grounds for penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) as required by law. The decision emphasized the significance of a valid and specific penalty notice in maintaining penalty orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>