<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 630 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415864</link>
    <description>Written acknowledgments of outstanding liability and later settlement proposals by the corporate debtor were treated as acknowledgments extending limitation, so the Section 9 insolvency application was not time-barred. Additional electronic correspondence, said to have been found in the appellant&#039;s internal database after the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, was also permitted on record and considered because it related directly to the admitted dues and settlement discussions. On that basis, the limitation finding was set aside and the operational creditor&#039;s case was allowed to proceed for further steps under the insolvency framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:05:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 630 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415864</link>
      <description>Written acknowledgments of outstanding liability and later settlement proposals by the corporate debtor were treated as acknowledgments extending limitation, so the Section 9 insolvency application was not time-barred. Additional electronic correspondence, said to have been found in the appellant&#039;s internal database after the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, was also permitted on record and considered because it related directly to the admitted dues and settlement discussions. On that basis, the limitation finding was set aside and the operational creditor&#039;s case was allowed to proceed for further steps under the insolvency framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>