<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 628 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415862</link>
    <description>A section 7 insolvency application was treated as within limitation because the corporate debtor&#039;s balance sheets and financial statements recorded the outstanding secured borrowings and operated as written acknowledgment of liability. The debtor&#039;s one-time settlement proposal, the creditor&#039;s acceptance, the signed settlement terms, and part-payment further showed an admitted subsisting debt and gave the claim a fresh contractual basis. The pendency of SARFAESI proceedings did not bar commencement of insolvency proceedings. On these facts, the limitation objection failed and the insolvency application remained maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 628 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415862</link>
      <description>A section 7 insolvency application was treated as within limitation because the corporate debtor&#039;s balance sheets and financial statements recorded the outstanding secured borrowings and operated as written acknowledgment of liability. The debtor&#039;s one-time settlement proposal, the creditor&#039;s acceptance, the signed settlement terms, and part-payment further showed an admitted subsisting debt and gave the claim a fresh contractual basis. The pendency of SARFAESI proceedings did not bar commencement of insolvency proceedings. On these facts, the limitation objection failed and the insolvency application remained maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>