https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415860 No interference was warranted with the adjudication order where the petitioner had been repeatedly informed of the legacy dispute resolution scheme but did not avail it within time. The Court found no breach of natural justice in the original adjudication process and rejected the request for relief after expiry of the scheme. It also recorded that it had not examined the merits of the tax demand and that other remedies available in law would remain open. en-us Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:04:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415860 No interference was warranted with the adjudication order where the petitioner had been repeatedly informed of the legacy dispute resolution scheme but did not avail it within time. The Court found no breach of natural justice in the original adjudication process and rejected the request for relief after expiry of the scheme. It also recorded that it had not examined the merits of the tax demand and that other remedies available in law would remain open. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415860