<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against a penalty under Section 271G of the Income Tax Act 1961 for AY 2008-09. The penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was deemed unjustified as there was no specific notice issued under Section 92D(3) before imposing the penalty. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents and emphasized the necessity of such a notice, leading to the deletion of the penalty amounting to Rs. 48,70,467.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against a penalty under Section 271G of the Income Tax Act 1961 for AY 2008-09. The penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was deemed unjustified as there was no specific notice issued under Section 92D(3) before imposing the penalty. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents and emphasized the necessity of such a notice, leading to the deletion of the penalty amounting to Rs. 48,70,467.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>