<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1305 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299472</link>
    <description>The application for Advance Ruling was rejected under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, as the question raised was already pending in proceedings related to the applicable tax rate for sub-contractors. The rejection was based on the proviso that prohibits admitting applications in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1305 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299472</link>
      <description>The application for Advance Ruling was rejected under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, as the question raised was already pending in proceedings related to the applicable tax rate for sub-contractors. The rejection was based on the proviso that prohibits admitting applications in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>