<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2068 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299481</link>
    <description>The court declined the petition, upholding the impugned order allowing amendments to the written statement as necessary for the trial. The court emphasized that the amendments were crucial for adjudicating the real controversy between the parties and directed the trial court to conclude the trial promptly due to the prolonged litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2068 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299481</link>
      <description>The court declined the petition, upholding the impugned order allowing amendments to the written statement as necessary for the trial. The court emphasized that the amendments were crucial for adjudicating the real controversy between the parties and directed the trial court to conclude the trial promptly due to the prolonged litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>