https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299480 Dismissal of a prior suit as barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC did not decide the damages claim on merits and therefore did not attract res judicata under Section 11 CPC. The Court held that the plaintiff could still seek the same relief by amendment in the pending injunction suit, including a claim for damages for defamation. Accordingly, the proposed amendment was not barred on the grounds of Order II Rule 2 or res judicata, and the challenge to the amendment failed. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:00:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299480 Dismissal of a prior suit as barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC did not decide the damages claim on merits and therefore did not attract res judicata under Section 11 CPC. The Court held that the plaintiff could still seek the same relief by amendment in the pending injunction suit, including a claim for damages for defamation. Accordingly, the proposed amendment was not barred on the grounds of Order II Rule 2 or res judicata, and the challenge to the amendment failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299480