https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299485 An application for rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) must be decided only on the plaint as a whole, without relying on the defendant's defence or other material outside the plaint. Where the plea of limitation depends on disputed facts such as knowledge of the transaction, alleged fraud, impersonation, or the date of discovery, the issue cannot be conclusively determined at the threshold. In such circumstances, the plaint cannot be rejected without trial, and limitation remains a triable issue. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299485 An application for rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) must be decided only on the plaint as a whole, without relying on the defendant's defence or other material outside the plaint. Where the plea of limitation depends on disputed facts such as knowledge of the transaction, alleged fraud, impersonation, or the date of discovery, the issue cannot be conclusively determined at the threshold. In such circumstances, the plaint cannot be rejected without trial, and limitation remains a triable issue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299485