<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (10) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299462</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and acquitting the appellant. The Court emphasized the necessity of corroboration in cases of retracted confessions and highlighted concerns regarding the reliability of eye-witness testimonies, identification parades, and the adequacy of the investigation. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough and reliable evidence to ensure justice in criminal cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (10) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299462</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and acquitting the appellant. The Court emphasized the necessity of corroboration in cases of retracted confessions and highlighted concerns regarding the reliability of eye-witness testimonies, identification parades, and the adequacy of the investigation. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough and reliable evidence to ensure justice in criminal cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>