https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299451 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the orders of the competent authority and the Appellate Tribunal. The proceedings were found to be valid despite the non-issuance of notice to the detenu, and the delay in initiating proceedings was not deemed unreasonable. The burden of proof was rightly placed on the petitioners, who failed to demonstrate the legality of the acquired properties. en-us Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:04:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299451 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the orders of the competent authority and the Appellate Tribunal. The proceedings were found to be valid despite the non-issuance of notice to the detenu, and the delay in initiating proceedings was not deemed unreasonable. The burden of proof was rightly placed on the petitioners, who failed to demonstrate the legality of the acquired properties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299451