<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1181 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299449</link>
    <description>Commission paid to sole selling agents was treated as an admissible business deduction on grounds of commercial expediency, following the Court&#039;s earlier line of reasoning. Interest on borrowed moneys was not disallowed under section 36(1)(iii) in relation to deposits collected and retained by the agents, again on the basis of prior precedent. Local cess and local cess surcharge were held deductible in the year the demand arose, with any later issue of cessation of liability under section 41 to be verified by the Tribunal for giving effect to the order. The reference was answered substantially in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:27:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1181 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299449</link>
      <description>Commission paid to sole selling agents was treated as an admissible business deduction on grounds of commercial expediency, following the Court&#039;s earlier line of reasoning. Interest on borrowed moneys was not disallowed under section 36(1)(iii) in relation to deposits collected and retained by the agents, again on the basis of prior precedent. Local cess and local cess surcharge were held deductible in the year the demand arose, with any later issue of cessation of liability under section 41 to be verified by the Tribunal for giving effect to the order. The reference was answered substantially in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>