https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299448 A suit for rendition of accounts of a dissolved partnership firm must be filed within limitation counted from dissolution, including dissolution by death of a partner under Section 42(c) of the Partnership Act. Article 5 of the Limitation Act governed the claim, and Section 17 applied only where fraud concealed the right or title on which the suit was founded. On the stated facts, the plaintiff knew of the right to seek accounts; the alleged false assurance did not conceal that right, and a later fraudulent assurance could not stop limitation after time had begun to run. The suit was therefore time-barred and the decree in the plaintiff's favour was liable to be set aside. en-us Fri, 01 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:53:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299448 A suit for rendition of accounts of a dissolved partnership firm must be filed within limitation counted from dissolution, including dissolution by death of a partner under Section 42(c) of the Partnership Act. Article 5 of the Limitation Act governed the claim, and Section 17 applied only where fraud concealed the right or title on which the suit was founded. On the stated facts, the plaintiff knew of the right to seek accounts; the alleged false assurance did not conceal that right, and a later fraudulent assurance could not stop limitation after time had begun to run. The suit was therefore time-barred and the decree in the plaintiff's favour was liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299448