<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 611 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415845</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the AAR&#039;s decision that the land filling pit is a civil structure and not plant and machinery, thus ineligible for input tax credit under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments and judicial precedents were considered but ultimately found unconvincing. The appeal was dismissed on all accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 611 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415845</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the AAR&#039;s decision that the land filling pit is a civil structure and not plant and machinery, thus ineligible for input tax credit under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments and judicial precedents were considered but ultimately found unconvincing. The appeal was dismissed on all accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>